The modality notions with ideational and interpersonal functions are content and person-oriented, respectively. In the proposed operational framework, we make a basic distinction between the modality notions that serve an ideational function (i.e., dynamic modal notions) and those with an interpersonal function (i.e., deontic and epistemic evaluations). In this paper we propose a more explicit framework for definition and evaluation of objectivity and (inter)subjectivity in the modality domain. More.Ī More Explicit Framework for Evaluating Objectivity and (Inter)Subjectivity in Modality DomainĪuthor(s): Gholamreza Medadian,Dariush Nezhadansari Mahabadi / Language(s): English Since the bulk of such a “trinitarian” metaphysics would be devoted to countenancing uninterpreted phenomena, I argue that current misgivings about sign-based ontologies are largely misplaced. Once we realize that the triadic sign’s components are each answerable to this asymmetric subsumption, we obtain the means to track at which level of complexity semiosis finds itself, in a given case. Moving away from the usual focus on (contentious) cosmological forces, I use a modal principle to partition various ontological layers: regular sign-action (like coded language) subsumes actual signaction (like here-and-now events) which in turn subsumes possible sign-action (like qualities related to whatever would be similar to them). Peirce’s suggestive blueprint for an inclusive outlook that grants reality to his three categories. More.Ī less simplistic metaphysics: Peirce’s layered theory of meaning as a layered theory of beingĪuthor(s): Marc Champagne / Language(s): English It will be argued that in order to achieve more extended conceptual clarification of the precise meaning of the field of rationality, further advancements in the understanding of the nature of the human mind are required. It turns out that these concepts are fully intelligible once located within philosophical stances on the relations between mathematics and physical reality. In order to explain this particular property of mathematics Życiński has first introduced the concept of the field of rationality together with the field of potentiality to be followed by Heller’s formal field and the field of categories.
The presented article offers a critical analysis of the philosophical motivations and development of a major attempt to resolve this task put forward by two prominent Polish philosophers: Józef Życiński and Michał Heller. The unusual applicability of mathematics to the description of the physical reality still remains a major investigative task for philosophers, physicists, mathematicians and cognitive scientists.
A critical analysis of the philosophical motivations and development of the concept of the field of rationality as a representation of the fundamental ontology of the physical realityĪuthor(s): Wojciech P.
0 kommentar(er)
